One year of war in Sudan
On the 15th of April 2023 a new
war broke out in Sudan. Sudan’s largest paramilitary group, the Rapid Support
Forces (RSF), initiated attacks against their supposed allies in the Sudanese
Armed Forces (SAF) in nearly every major city across Sudan in what appeared to
be some sort of an attempted coup. What started with clashes between former allies
as part of a personal power struggle has turned into one of the world’s worst
humanitarian crises. One year and thousands of deaths into the war there is no military
end in sight, and the world’s traditional peacemaker countries are
conspicuously absent in talks.
The leader of the RSF is a man named
Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, usually known by his nickname “Hemedti”. He had been the
second in command in Sudan’s transitional sovereignty council led by his friend
and close ally Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. The relationship between these two men
is central in Sudanese politics, and the breakdown in their relations is what
caused one of the worst ongoing wars in the world.[1] There
is no real ideological difference between the two, with both of them military
men and both aspiring to rule Sudan alone.
Both Burhan and Hemedti started their
career in service of the same dictator, Omar al-Bashir. By the time his reign
ended in 2019 he had been in power of Sudan for 30 years. Key to his regime’s
longevity was the fracturing of his security forces into multiple separate
armed groups. Burhan was the leader of the army, while Hemedti was the leader
of a major militia known as the Janjaweed, which would eventually be
professionalized and turned into the modern RSF. The purpose of maintaining
what was in practice multiple armies was allegedly to keep any one of them from
gaining the strength to overthrow Bashir’s government.[2]
On the 11th of April 2019
Bashir’s government was overthrown by a mass popular uprising with the help of
the military. What followed was a period of military-civilian co-rule which was
again ended when Burhan and Hemedti carried out a coup against the civilian
parts of government in 2021. The resilience of Burhan and Hemedti’s alliance in
power was already called into question before that coup, when central figures
in the Sudanese army began openly considering integrating the RSF into the
army, which would rob Hemedti of his main source of power.[3] From
there relations between Hemedti and Burhan, and consequently relations between the
army and the RSF, steadily declined until Hemedti started the civil war in
April and made the rift official.
The war:
The RSF and SAF currently have control of around
half of the populated regions in Sudan each, and most reports placed their
strength at the beginning of the war at around 100 000 soldiers each. The RSF
held the initiative for the first months,[4] but
since the start of 2024 results have been more mixed, and the Sudanese army
have started seeing more battlefield success.[5] The
RSF, being a paramilitary force, is armed with lighter weapons and more mobile
vehicles than the army, which relies on its armored vehicles and air force to
win ground.[6]
The war is not a stalemate yet, but neither side seems to have a decisive edge.
In the opening days of the war RSF troops attempted to seize control in most major cities of Sudan, with their most important efforts being in the capital city Khartoum. The RSF managed to capture a lot of important sites in Khartoum, but they were not able to gain complete control of the city. While the RSF still probably control most of the city, an SAF offensive in February broke through RSF lines outside of the city and reached Omdurman, the northwestern part of the Khartoum tri-city area. At the time of writing Khartoum is still heavily contested, with the battle having lasted over a year. The side that wins the battle of Khartoum will have control over what is Sudan’s largest city by far, with all the power and legitimacy that brings.
Sudan was already home to multiple armed
rebel groups that opposed the Sudanese government prior to the beginning of the
last war. The Sudanese regional civil wars in the Darfur and South Kordofan
regions only ended in 2020 with the signing of the Juba agreement, with clauses
that specify how the different armed groups should disarm or integrate into the
armed forces.[7]
By the time the war with the RSF started in 2023 the peace process was still
ongoing, and the old rebel groups existed, though inactive.
Many of these groups have reentered the
conflict as a kind of third side in the war. At the time of writing none of
these rebel groups are close to either Burhan or Hemedti in strength, but as
they keep focusing on tearing down each other that may change. It is currently unclear
if any side of the war is hurt more by the rebels, but as more rebel groups
take up their arms again that may also change.[8]
Foreign involvement:
The war in Sudan is not a proxy war in a
traditional sense, as the world’s great powers are largely uninvolved in the
conflict. The outside powers that are involved are a string of Arab states with
opposing goals and an ambiguous Russia. Most states in the region officially
claim to not be involved in the war or call for dialogue to end it, but outside
investigations have shown that weapons do stream into Sudan from other
countries and armed groups. Oddly, few of the investigations into the weapon
supply of the different sides cover where the Sudanese Army’s weapons come from.
The RSF receives its weapons through
smuggling routes in Chad, Libya, the Central African Republic, and South Sudan.[9] In
the early war the RSF’s main supporter was the Libyan national army in east
Libya, led by field marshal Khalifa Haftar.[10]
Their relationship dates back to at least the Libyan civil war, as the RSF in
2019 provided Haftar with troops who fought in his failed offensive on Tripoli.[11] The
main provider of advanced weaponry to the RSF is likely the United Arab
Emirates, according to a UN report.[12]
Russia was working with Burhan’s government
to establish a Russian naval base in Port Sudan, which would give the Russian navy
easy access to the Red Sea and Indian Ocean.[13] Despite
the port deal giving Russia obvious incentives to want a stable and united
Sudan, the Wagner group has been supplying the RSF with weapons, continuing
their long-standing partnership.[14] The
Russian government appears to back Burhan, but with Wagner support for his main
enemy that may be hard to believe.[15] In
a rather absurd turn of events, Ukrainian special forces have allegedly
appeared in Sudan to attack Wagner units.[16]
Burhan and the Sudanese Army do not have international
backers that seem as committed as the supporters of the RSF are. There was
early speculation that Egypt might fully intervene in the war on the side of
the SAF, as the Egyptian and Sudanese militaries are traditional allies.[17] While
Burhan is a close ally of Egyptian president el-Sisi, so are Haftar and the United
Arab Emirates. Despite these dilemmas, a full Egyptian intervention on the side
of Burhan might be one of the only ways to bring a military end to the conflict
without lasting years.
Humanitarian crisis:
A year of fighting has made Sudan the center
of one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises. The fighting alone makes it
one of the world’s deadliest current wars, with UN reports in January estimating
over 13 000 dead.[18] The
consequences of the war have been far reaching for the ordinary civilian
population of Sudan, with fighting causing a breakdown in supply lines for food
and medicine.
Sudan was already a country receiving food
aid, and the war has pushed the crisis into the extreme. More than a third of Sudan’s
population of nearly fifty million faces acute hunger.[19] The
scale of the hunger in Sudan is such that the UN’s World Food Program struggles
to gather the funds for relief efforts. Even in places where international aid
groups are active the support is not enough to save everyone, with children in
particular suffering deaths from hunger and related illness at alarming rates.[20]
Sudan has a young population, with about
half its people below the age of 18. Wars always affect children the worst, and
with Sudan’s many children the results are disastrous. The hunger crisis disproportionately
harms children, but even for those who survive their future is in peril. A
whole 90% of Sudan’s schools are closed, forcing 19 million children out of the
education system.[21] The
generals who gamble with the future of Sudan know to use the children for their
own gain, with Hemedti’s RSF having been proven to have used child soldiers on
multiple occasions.[22]
The crisis has forced millions of Sudanese
people out of their homes, with most of them now being internally displaced in
camps around Sudan. Almost seven million people are internally displaced, and almost
two million are refugees in surrounding countries, making almost one in five
Sudanese people forcibly displaced.[23]
The surrounding countries that some have been forced to flee to also include
some of the world’s poorest states. Chad, which has taken in half a million
refugees, is now Africa’s largest host of refugees per capita and in need of
help itself.[24]
The tragedies in Sudan are not limited to inevitable
costs of war. Both Hemedti and Burhan’s armies actively commit war crimes and
crimes against humanity on a large scale. Civilians in Sudan are subjected to
killings and rapes, both near the frontlines and in RSF occupied areas.[25] The
UN estimate of the death count is most likely too low, as credible reports are
made in areas controlled by the RSF of massacres killing thousands, maybe tens
of thousands.[26]
As both sides in the war are led by criminals they’re both interested in keeping
the free press silent, which in turn makes Sudan something of an informational
black hole.[27]
When the war is over information access will hopefully be easier, but as of now
no one knows the full scale of the atrocities in Sudan.
The peace process is slow, but both sides
in the war have shown at least some willingness to cooperate on reaching an end
to the conflict. Indeed, during the first 100 days of the conflict there were five
ceasefires.[28]
They were also all violated. Both sides in the conflict consistently reject
talks organized by foreign actors they see as supporting the other side, which
stalls the peace process.[29] The
new year did not bring much hope, as both Hemedti and Burhan avoided planned
meetings to discuss the peace process.[30] Apart
from abortive efforts to organize a ceasefire around Ramadan, the peace process
as a whole appears to have frozen entirely, and they may remain frozen until
something changes militarily.[31] While
it’s hard to see a clear and likely end to the war now, that will change. For the
sake of the people of Sudan, that end should come as soon as possible.
Sources:
[3] https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210628-sudan-s-transition-faces-hurdle-of-merging-paramilitary-into-army
[6] https://theconversation.com/sudan-is-awash-with-weapons-how-the-two-forces-compare-and-what-that-means-for-the-war-205434
[7] https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/the-juba-agreement-for-peace-in-sudan-en.pdf
(section 8)
[9] https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publications/giga-focus/the-war-in-sudan-how-weapons-and-networks-shattered-a-power-struggle
[20] https://www.msf.org/sudan-urgent-response-needed-amid-high-death-rates-and-malnutrition-crisis-north-darfur
[21] https://www.learningpassport.org/stories/sudans-19-million-learners-are-facing-worlds-worst-education-crisis
[24] https://reliefweb.int/report/chad/unhcr-chad-fears-very-real-prospect-more-sudanese-refugee-arrivals-needs-support-enar
[26] https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/ethnic-killings-one-sudan-city-left-up-15000-dead-un-report-2024-01-19/
Comments
Post a Comment